Pomp and Circumstance: What We Learned From Comic-Con 2012

Another Comic-Con has come and gone, and we’re a little bit older and a little bit wis………..well we’re older. Before we rush on to new things and forget all that has transpired, I believe that a summary should be made so we can have a historical viewpoint of all the hype. That way, if anything comes out of comic con that is actually genre defining and culturally significant, we will be able to properly document the origin of its hype and genesis of its following. With this in mind, lets look at three of the movies that were on display at Comic Con this year and see what we learned about them.

1. “Pacific Rim”

What its all about?

Pacific Rim is an upcoming science fiction film directed by Guillermo Del Toro based on a screenplay by Travis Beacham. The film is set in a world where soldiers piloting giant robots battle against giant monsters who have mysteriously risen five miles from beneath the ocean. The film will be an homage to Japanese giant monster films, known as Kaiju. Del Toro has said the film will be “a beautiful poem to giant monsters”

What we learned about it.

Basically, Del Toro wasn’t able to close the deal on “At the Mountain’s of Madness” so he mounts a multi-million dollar cinematic reincarnation of the final act of a power rangers episode in order to pander to his geek fans. Excuse me if I sound cynical, but it takes more than a fanciful concept (“poem to giant monsters films”….) to get me excited for an upcoming film. Especially a concept that sounds as tired and overdone as what Del Toro is proposing with “Pacific Rim”.



2. “The Man of Steel”

What its all about?

“The Man of Steel” is an upcoming  superhero film based on the DC Comics character Superman. The film will be a reboot of the Superman Film Series undertaken by director Zach Synder (of “300” and “Watchmen” fame) with a screenplay by David S. Goyer. The entire project will be overseen by Christopher Nolan who acts as both producer and creative consultant.

What we learned about it.

Against all odds, it seems Nolan has found a way of infusing his trademark mindless unimaginative nihilism into the hopeful and pure Superman Mythology. According to film “journalist” Quint at aintitcool.com, the footage shown at comic con is of a Superman who is “unsure of his role in our world”. Really? Are we going to waste over 100 million dollar to reboot the character of Superman just so we can load him down with uncertainty and angst? Seems a waste of time and a tad overreaching since the whole uncertainty angle was treated as only a footnote in the narratives of the Donner and Singer incarnations. I think by now most people (including the character himself) understand Superman’s purpose. I.E. he saves people. He is a modern sort of God/diety in the world. I think there is enough in that concept to explore alone, if you think deeply about it and are brave enough to confront the social and religious ramafications of what being a God/Diety/Savior means to a society, but this whole Superman is an uncertain hero thing is just fashionable pandering of pseudo intellectual psychodrama for the Nolanites. Color me unimpressed.



3. Iron Man 3

What its all About?

Iron Man 3 is an upcoming superhero film featuring the Marvel comics character Iron Man. It is a sequel to IM:1 (2008) and IM:2 (2010) and will be the seventh installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, being the first major release since the crossover film The Avengers(2012). Shane Black, is set to direct and write the script (with Drew Pierce). Jon Favreau, who directed the first two films, will serve as executive producer. Robert Downey Jr. reprises his role as Tony Stark, with Gwyneth Paltrow and Don Cheadle reprising their roles as Pepper Potts and James Rhodes respectively.

What We Learned about it.

Favreau fumbled the snap on Iron Man 2, so Marvel scooped up once in-demand screenwriter Shane Black (what, Joe Eszterhas wasn’t available?) on the sly to gain some cheap credibility with the genre enthusiasts and the small percentage of people that think “Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang” is a modern film noir classic. Other than that we were shown some pretty new suits and some sensational flashy footage, all buffered by a joking Robert Downey Jr. doing his charming rouge routine, all of this distracting the public from the fact that this franchise may not be able to rebound from the misguided excess of its second chapter.



Other Items of Note:

“Judge Dredd” is still awful.

People still worship Joss Whedon over the promise of what “Firefly” might of been.

People are willing to get excited over test footage. Test Footage!



Which I guess isn’t suprising seeing as people are willing to get excited over a teaser poster.


Quentin Tarantino still talks too much.

Lastly, the big secret behind Star Trek 2 is that it won’t be very good. Its sad that people are so concerned with figuring out who the new villain is, while they forget that the first film was a bastardized mess of time travel nonsense, lens flare and rushed character development.

So there you have it. Comic Con in a nutshell. Sad to see how a once humble gathering of comic book fans has turned into a massive commercial pander fest for geeks.  It would be nice if there was a convention that celebrated the art of comic books and wasn’t just about selling you something. Not that there isn’t some fun to be had there. Comic-Con isn’t all bad. There is still hope. Maybe one day Comic Con will return to its roots and be more of a celebration instead of a just an excuse for hawking product. Time will tell.



About celluloidhumanoid

Celluloid Prophet

Posted on July 16, 2012, in Film and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 10 Comments.

  1. Man of Steel will be the film Superman Returns should have been. Superman should have doubts and feel like he can’t do it all. He shouldn’t find out he knocked up his chick five years earlier.

  2. “Lastly, the big secret behind Star Trek 2 is that it won’t be very good. Its sad that people are so concerned with figuring out who the new villain is, while they forget that the first film was a bastardized mess of time travel nonsense, lens flare and rushed character development.” — Thank you. And no, *I* did NOT forget, which is why I could care less if there’s a Star Trek 2. For me, Star Trek died after the last Nextgen movie.

  3. Ouch. But out of fairness, what awesomely original and utterly enchanting film *are* you looking forward to? There’s a lot of dislike herein, so what, in your opinion, is the alternative?

    • Brian De Palma’s “Passion”
      Walter Hill’s “Bullet in the Head”
      Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln”
      Spike Lee’s Red Hook Summer
      Joe Wright’s Anna Karenina
      Genndy Tartakovsky’s Hotel Transylvania
      David Koepp’s Premium Rush (Die Hard on a bike)

      Don’t mean to come off as a snob. I’m just on the look out for exciting directors doing something different.

      • Fair enough. Hotel Transylvania is shaping up well from what they’ve shared so far, but Die Hard on a Bike is going to be a tough sell to anyone not into Xtreme sports.

  4. wow…totally glad I’m not taking my cues from a cynical douche. While you’re at home complaining about EVERYTHING, I’ll be having a good time at the movies. Cheers.

    And for the record…on the Firefly reference…its “might HAVE”…just saying

    • Firstly, thank you

      Let it be said that I was always willing to accept correction. I want people to come to this website and see excellence, and by you calling me out, i’m getting closer and closer to the mark.

      Nevertheless, I see spelling mistakes as a very trivial issue when considering all that is wrong with internet journalism. When I speak of what is wrong with film blogging I usually talk about it being amateurish, unlearned and sensationalist from a point of view dealing strictly with content. Believe me, if spelling mistakes were the only problem I saw with these film blogs, there would not be a film-cycle. Its a bigger more intrinsic issue I hope to address through my website. I hope you continue to read and keep me on my toes as I do.

      Also I don’t mean to come off cynical. I only want to see film taken serious as an art from. I try not to be negative just for the heck of it. Its just that I see so much commercialism and sensationalist drivel that draw people away from great cinema and I try to pinpoint it. That’s all. I hope I didn’t offend your sensibilities.

  5. So apart from Comic-Con, what did the Romans ever do for us?

  6. Kragnor the Apparent

    omg, this is fucking terrible. Do you LIKE anything? You don’t even have the right suit in the IM3 picture, that’s a fake mock up of the Iron Patriot. The one spotted has an entirely different color scheme. Quit spamming your shit on IMDB.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Film Colony ♛

with Alicia Mayer

Things 90s Kids Realize

A warm & fuzzy cup of nostalgia for my fellow 90s kids.

Streamline | The Official Filmstruck Blog

Streamline is the official blog of FilmStruck, a new subscription service that offers film aficionados a comprehensive library of films including an eclectic mix of contemporary and classic art house, indie, foreign and cult films.

%d bloggers like this: